Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03483
Original file (BC 2012 03483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

                   RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03483

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Jul 12 be declared void 
and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System 
(AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her contested FA was improperly administered as her weight was 
initially taken before the walk with her shoes on.  The Physical 
Training Leader (PTL) found the discrepancy after her FA was 
completed, took her weight again, then input the scores.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

On 13 Jul 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and 
attained an unsatisfactory score of 72.1.  Information extracted 
from the AFFMS indicates the applicant failed the cardio 
component of the contested FA, the 1.0 mile walk.  She re-took 
the FA 7 days later and scored an Excellent (91.80).

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 92.80 Excellent 7 May 13Exempt
Exempt 20 Jul 12 91.80 Excellent*13 Jul 12 72.10 Unsatisfactory2 Feb 12
82.00 Satisfactory

* Contested FA

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, 2.4.1.1. “Body 
composition (height, weight, and AC) must be the first component 
assessed in the FA.”  While the weight is not calculated into 
the composite score, it is used in the formula to calculate the 
score for the 1.0-Mile Walk: “Calculate member’s score 
(estimated VO2 max) using the following formula which 
incorporates body weight (lb), age (yr), gender (males = 1, 
females = 0), time to complete one mile (min), and post exercise 
heart rate (bpm): 

Estimated VO2 max (ml/kg/min) = 132.853 – 0.0769(Weight) – 
0.3877(Age) + 6.315(Gender) – 3.2649(Time) – 0.1565(HR)  

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine 
overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness 
score and minimum scores per three component areas:  Aerobic 
Fitness (1.5 mile run or 1.0 mile walk), Body Composition 
(abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness 
(number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute 
each).  Military members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 
scale based on the following maximum component scores: 60 points 
for aerobic, 20 points for body composition, 10 points for push-
ups and 10 points for sit-ups.  To determine individual 
composite fitness scores the Air Force uses age and gender 
specific fitness score charts.  An unsatisfactory is a composite 
score less than 75 and/or one or more component minimums are not 
met.

A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness 
Assessment Appeals Board on 14 Feb 14, because the applicant’s 
weight is not a scored component of the fitness assessment; as 
such, improper weighing does not affect the overall composite 
score.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request due to 
lack of supporting evidence from the facilitator to confirm the 
components of the contested FA were administered in the wrong 
order.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, 
is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 28 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA 
was improperly administered.   Although the applicant contends 
the body composition component of the contested FA was 
improperly administered, she has provided no evidence to support 
this claim.  Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________


Due to the unavailability of XXXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXX has 
signed as Acting Panel Chair.  The following members of the 
Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-03483 in Executive 
Session on 21 May 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				, Chair
				, Member
				, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jul 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 31 Dec 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.




				XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
				Acting Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02087

    Original file (BC 2013 02087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The V02 in the calculation is 35.807808, when applied to the Alternate Aerobic Test Score Chart in AFI 36-2905, Atch 17, the resulting component score equals a component score of 42.3. Therefore, the AFFMS Fitness Calculator has in fact calculated applicant's score IAW AFI 36-2905. On 2 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “No evidence of impropriety, V02 calculations IAW AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00248

    Original file (BC-2013-00248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03936

    Original file (BC 2013 03936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the applicant renders a variety of arguments intended undermine the functioning of the heart rate monitors used during the contested FAs, the only real evidence he has provided in support of his assertions is a supporting statement from a colleague who says he made an independent measurement of the applicant’s heart rate after the end of the 5 May 13 FA. However, we do not find this statement or the applicant’s arguments sufficient to conclude that he is the victim of an error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02985

    Original file (BC 2013 02985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the documentation provided by the applicant, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim. Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider this request. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01210

    Original file (BC-2012-01210.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s commander, by letter dated 14 Mar 12, requests the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score be removed from his records or nullified. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial to remove the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score from the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01944

    Original file (BC 2013 01944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The updated AFFMS record indicates applicant continued to achieve unsatisfactory scores due to a composite score of 69.5 on both contested FAs. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 13 70.00 Unsatisfactory 29 May 13 81.5 Satisfactory 27 Jul 12 Exempt Exempt *30 May 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board corrected the AFFMS records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05107

    Original file (BC 2012 05107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05107 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 21 Sep 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant did not provide any evidence his 1.0 mile walk was improperly administered during the FA. The 21 Sep 2012 FA was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01179

    Original file (BC-2012-01179.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio component of his Fitness Assessment score dated 1 February 2012, be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01299

    Original file (BC 2013 01299.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 06 Oct 2011, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 71.00, unsatisfactory. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Apr 2013 72.00 Unsatisfactory *30 Nov 2012 60.22 Unsatisfactory 30 Mar 2012 90.33 Excellent 09 Nov 2011 83.67 Satisfactory *06 Oct 2011 71.00 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to...